Spore emocje po obu stronach rosyjsko-ukraińskiej granicy wywołuje postać 18-letniej Julii Tolopy z Kraju Stawropolskiego. Młoda rosyjska nacjonalistka od kilku miesięcy walczy w szeregach ochotniczego batalionu „Ajdar”. Przed dołączeniem do jednostki brała udział w protestach na kijowskim Majdanie. Jak sama tłumaczyła, wspiera bratni naród w wojnie z separatystami i putinowskimi najeźdźcami. Podkreśla, iż za wydarzenia na wschodzie Ukrainy nie należy obwiniać Rosjan, a jedynie postsowieckich władców Kremla, którzy odpowiadają za korupcję, masowy napływ imigrantów, fałszowanie historii, degenerację moralną społeczeństwa i represje na nacjonalistach.
Julia przed przybyciem na Ukrainę była w swoim kraju nie tylko aktywistką narodową, ale także brała udział w turniejach sztuk walki oraz szkoleniach militarnych organizowanych przez tamtejsze organizacje. Jest chyba pierwszą kobietą z Rosji, która walczy w szeregach ukraińskich ochotniczych batalionów. Separatyści i „antyfaszyści” na forach i stronach internetowych wzywają do przykładnego ukarania dziewczyny. Najwięcej Rosjan służy w pułku „Azow” i wciąż napływają kolejne zgłoszenia. W Rosji w środowisku nacjonalistycznym trwa tymczasem dyskusja nad organizacją tegorocznego „Ruskiego Marszu”. Większość aktywistów nie chce, żeby przeobraził się on w poparcie i legitymizację dla działań reżimu Putina.
Na podstawie: kavpolit.com/Informacje nadesłane
***
Krótki reportaż o rosyjskich ochotnikach pułku „Azow”
27 września 2014 o 15:03
Czyż to nie ideał?
27 września 2014 o 16:36
Bo każdy naród ma swoje panny wyklęte, hehe.
28 września 2014 o 13:07
Przewiduję,że w najbliższym czasie rosyjscy „nacjonaliści” mogą-podpuszczeni przez agenturę podszywającą się pod ich zagranicznych kolegów-narobić tam sporo bałaganu choć nie obalą Putina bo są na to za słabi.Nie rozumiem zachowania tych ludzi,to jest dopiero jakaś degrengolada.Przede wszystkim jak można walczyć ze swoimi rodakami na Donbasie u boku ludzi którzy nie raz dawali świadectwo swojej nienawiści do wszystkiego co ma związek z Rosją?Neobanderowcy z tego czy innego batalionu to nie są żadni bracia jak sobie ubzdurało to dziewczę -to wyrzutki słowiańszczyzny i te gnoje już mają na swoim koncie popełnione zbrodnie wojenne.A co się tyczy ludzi którzy organizują ten Ruski Marsz-każdy z nich wymachiwał co roku imperialną flagą a teraz jak Putin tworzy nowe imperium słusznie przyłączając dawne ziemie rosyjskie zamieszkane przez ruskich-to im to nie w smak ?
28 września 2014 o 13:20
„Przede wszystkim jak można walczyć ze swoimi rodakami na Donbasie u boku ludzi którzy nie raz dawali świadectwo swojej nienawiści do wszystkiego co ma związek z Rosją?” – jeżeli to „wszystko, co ma związek z Rosją” to neokomunizm, imperializm, alkoholizm i Putin, to powinni zintensyfikować jeszcze nienawiść i wypalić to kurewstwo żywym ogniem. Podejrzewam jednak, że p…isz farmazony.
.
„Neobanderowcy z tego czy innego batalionu to nie są żadni bracia jak sobie ubzdurało to dziewczę -to wyrzutki słowiańszczyzny i te gnoje już mają na swoim koncie popełnione zbrodnie wojenne.”
Dlaczego wyrzutki? Bo tak twierdzi jakaś łajza internetowa, co by się pewnie popłakała na widok naładowanej śrutówki? I od kiedy rosyjscy bieli ludie ze skośnymi oczyma i nazwiskami typu Piździoszwili są elitą słowiańszczyzny?
.
Bolszewia i liberalizm nie mają narodowości, do ich zwolenników należy strzelać i nie pytać, w jakim mówią języku.
28 września 2014 o 19:20
Czyli innymi słowy potępia Putina i jego żydowskich oligarchów, ale walczy za Czekoladowego Króla i Kołomojskiego. Cóż, za ideał…
” I od kiedy rosyjscy bieli ludie ze skośnymi oczyma i nazwiskami typu Piździoszwili są elitą słowiańszczyzny? :-)”
To, że tacy ludzie są w rządzie to nie oznacza, że cały naród ma skośne oczy i azjatyckie nazwiska.
28 września 2014 o 23:53
„To, że tacy ludzie są w rządzie to nie oznacza, że cały naród ma skośne oczy i azjatyckie nazwiska.”- nie, ale mentalność nahajki smaganej kańczugiem po plecach jest tam niestety rozpowszechniona we wszystkie kierunki kompasu.
29 września 2014 o 06:36
Równie dobrze 18-letnia Polka mogłaby np. w roku 1945 bronić Berlina przed „najazdem hord bolszewicko-alianckich”. Tak to jest, kiedy opozycja wobec rządu czy systemu przeradza się w opozycję wobec własnego państwa.
Ale może to taki true-hard reakcjonizm właśnie? Jak ci rojaliści francuscy, co po stronie obcych państw walczyli przeciw Francji napoleońskiej?
29 września 2014 o 14:43
A niby dlaczego nie tak jakby Niemieccy antyfaszyści walczący przeciwko III Rzeszy? Zresztą przecież nie tylko tzw. „antyfaszyści” byli zaangażowani w walkę z hitlerowskim systemem.
„Tak to jest, kiedy opozycja wobec rządu czy systemu przeradza się w opozycję wobec własnego państwa” cóż w takim razie począć z casusem Hiszpanii, z lat trzydziestych…
Ciekawszy problem będziemy mieli jeśli przeciw sobie stanie Koreańczyk z południa i z północy, jak rozstrzygnąć kto prowadzi działania o charakterze antypaństwowym, albo co więcej antynarodowym?
29 września 2014 o 15:20
Ostatnio przy temacie o walońskich ochotnikach w SS, podjąłem taki temat. Wg germanofilów to bardzo możliwe, że gdyby 18-letnia Polka w 45 roku broniła Berlina to rzeczywiście broniła by Europę przed najazdem hord bolszewickich.
29 września 2014 o 18:11
Organizatorzy corocznego „Ruskiego Marszu” w Moskwie, który jest największą demonstracją nacjonalistów w Rosji, podjęli decyzję o głośnym podkreśleniu swojego stanowiska wobec konfliktu zbrojnego na Ukrainie. Tegoroczny „Ruski Marsz” 4 listopada odbędzie się w asyście proukraińskich haseł………….
Czytaj dalej http://www.autonom.pl/?p=9647
29 września 2014 o 22:40
Słowianie zamiast strzelać do siebie powinni się zjednoczyć przeciw światowemu syjonizmowi.Nakręcacie się Ukrainą a u nas nie lepiej wcale.Ktoś miał cel w tym całym Majdanie i ktoś wzniecił tą wojnę.Domyślcie się kto.
30 września 2014 o 13:16
Ciekawy wywiad z ukraińską nacjonalistką, mieszkającą w Hiszpanii, niestety tylko po angielsku.
*
1) In Spain in particular and the world in general the information we receive through the media is quite distorted, can you explain what is happening right now in Ukraine?
- Right now what is happening in Ukraine is an open invasion by Russia. I could not tell if this conflict is being to be resolved or not. A few days ago we agreed to withdraw us, Ukrainians, 15 km, leaving behind our positions while the Russians do the same. On September 24, we fulfilled our part of the bargain, they too. But there are some groups of pro-Russian militias that disagree with that plan and for several days have continued attacking our positions. On the night of September 24 fires have ceased, and it was the first day in a long time with no casualties of our side, or the side of the Russians. As always, the government promises us weapons and send help, but we never got anything. We all have assimilated we are alone in this and we will not receive any material support from the government. One of the good news is that with this „ceasefire”, the two sides have exchanged prisoners, so now we have a few thousand Ukrainian guys back. However, the situation in Ukraine changes every day. As there is now peace, it can return tomorrow to bombing some village or bombarding our positions. That’s unpredictable.
2) What do you think about that Donbass area is a historic Russian territory? Are the people of eastern Ukraine – Russians?
- They are Russian citizens from the year 1932 to 1933. Those were the years of the Holodomor, in those regions where the Red Army encircled the villages. They took off all the food, and finally the whole villages disappeared because people were starving. In total, 22,000 families have been moved from Russia to those empty houses extinct Ukrainian villages. And they did not willingly, but by order of their government. The Russians usually have difficulty getting used to life outside of Russia. One of the greatest qualities of the Russians is contempt for other nations.
Many Russians have emigrated to other countries or continents for economic and social reasons, and have no plan to return to their historic homeland, but they still love Russia and are suffering for her while away. Maybe that’s a mystery of the Russian soul…
This great migration of Russians to Ukraine is a slow-acting pump that has broken today. People usually behave in different ways while living in a land that is not theirs. And above all, the Russians, who have been transferred to foreign lands, not because they wanted to, but because the government has moved them there. And they support the government moved them there. And so they vote in elections and show their disrespect towards the Ukrainian language and Ukrainian culture, and so they will raise their children.
It takes time for these Russians became Ukrainians. Surely, less than a hundred years. I believe that this process will be faster if Ukraine will improve financially. If the standard of living in Ukraine is better than in Russia, these „compatriots” no longer want to have any relation to their historical homeland, as world experience shows the Russians.
3) policies of the presidents of the former USSR (Stalin, Kruchev, Gorbachev…) somehow have caused this situation?
- The policies of the presidents of the former USSR caused many other historical events that affected both the Russian people and the people of Ukraine, for example, the Holodomor, in the years 1932-1933 took place throughout the territory of Ukraine and resulted in a significant loss of human lives. At this time, the situation that occurs in the Ukrainian regions have caused those forces which are now in the Kremlin. By the way, talking about those in the Kremlin are all former members of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. This whole situation is artificially created by the forces of the Kremlin, who manipulate their own people for selfish ends, which are very profitable. First, conquering and uniting the new regions of Ukraine to the Russian Federation, all conquered territories to the Crimea, that the peninsula has a unique border that is Russia. Second, the occupants of the Kremlin are very afraid of repeating of the Maidan in Russia by the Russians themselves nationalists, the vast majority of which supported the Maidan and ATO (Antiterrorists Operation). Not all or even most multicultural swallowed the propaganda trick Kremlin who transformed a sister nation in an illusory enemy of the russian nation.
4) Do you think Putin runs an expansionary economic policy in order to create a geopolitical bloc that, along with China, then the business competition to US-EU axis? What is the role of Ukraine in the conflict?
Putin made a huge strategic error by breaking the rule book of international relations without asking China. Also made it clear that China adheres to principles of non-interference in the internal affairs of any government that respects the independence, sovereignty and territorial value of Ukraine. So I doubt he get it right, what he has planned to do.
5) In your opinion, what changes brought the new president, Petro Poroshenko respect Mr Yanukovich, the former?
- I would say that no noticeable change. We are at war, it is impossible to compare how Yanukovich governed in peacetime and how Poroshenko in wartime. From the beginning, I did not like Poroshenko. It is another oligarch, and that’s not a secret. Clearly, what he wants, is to stop this war either way, even if he have to forfeit the two regions of Donbass for it, which pisses us a lot, because during the last few months our boys were defending Donbass and risking their lives for these regions, thing that they do not have to do, but they do. And Poroshenko plans to give up after all these deaths of both civilians and soldiers and volunteers.
Returning to the comparison of the two oligarchs, keep in mind that Yanukovych is a criminal who was twice in prison and cannot even speak Ukrainian. Instead, Poroshenko speaks fluent English and Ukrainian. Also, I have to admit that if Yanukovych was in place at this moment, of Poroshenko, Ukraine would cease to exist long ago.
However, we are not satisfied with this president. It’s better than Yanukovych, but that’s not the president our country needs right now. We need a leader that puts the Ukrainian people to do anything and everything possible to keep our united and prepared for future threats nation. But of course, this is a personal opinion. All Ukrainians have a different opinion on Poroshenko.
6) What was the trigger for the riots in Kiev? Why the people took to the streets?
- Existing levels of corruption in our country drowned citizens, thousands of people had to go to Eastern Europe to seek a better quality of life (including me and some of my family), but for the rest of the Ukrainians, the EU was the only hope. Just 28 November Yanukovych had to sign an association agreement with the EU, but he did not, which has sparked anger in the monumental thousands of people who believed in a rapprochement with Europe. That was the main trigger that sent everyone out into the streets to protest against the decision unilaterally taken by Yanukovych and his government without taking into account the opinion and choice of most Ukrainians was the association itself. But the real reason was not that Maidan. Or not for long. When the first murder took place, people realized how they really bad living was and the horrible way we were treated by the government. Yanukovych thought killing a Protestant would remove the rest of the activists. But it was not, was at the time, when people decided to stay in Maidan, and not by the EU but by your own country, your own nation. At that time it was when we started our true Revolution
7) Inside war… how the battalions of volunteers were organized? Can you talk briefly about each of them?
- In total there are 37 battalions, besides regional and paramilitary organizations. The most popular, largest and most important are: the battalion „Azov”, „Donbass”, „Aidar” and groups of „Right Sektor”.
The Azov and Right Sector Preview battalions were organized at the time in Maidan, although at that time did not exist as such. That rather was a base through which these battalions later created more easily. SNA (Social-Nationalist Assembly) is the organization that after Maidan and conflict of Crimea, creates the battalion Azov. And Pravyi Sektor create several battalions in every region. They was not very difficult to recruit people, because organizations that were already existed for some time.The battalions that were practically nothing were the battalion Donbass and the battalion Aidar.
The Donbass battalion was created by the National Guard of Ukraine when he had an existing pro-war and pro-Russian Ukrainians. They recruited people from all over Ukraine, but at least 60% of the battalion was formed by citizens of Donetsk region.
The Aidar battalion was created in May 2014 this battalion there are people from all over Ukraine, Lviv from people, even people of Crimea and Lugansk. At the time of the presidential elections, the battalion took care of maintaining order in some regions of Lugansk, for example, which made them quite popular.
8) Battalion Azov seems that is the most controversial of these battalions … its emblem, the fact that recruiting foreign volunteers … how Ukrainians to see this battalion in particular?
- Every Ukrainian is positioned differently on this issue. Some look upon this battalion, others say it could be a threat. And others simply want nothing to do with these kids because they consider them „Nazis” or „neo-Nazi”. These guys may be extremists and radicals and not support National Socialism, for example, but people will confuse them with „Nazis” without really knowing what it is to be a „Nazi.” That happened, happens and will happen.
Especially with people who do not understand about the nationalist movements. Although, quite ironic is that they are those who risk and give their lives for the future of our nation’s most radical right. At first, there were many people who did not understand, had difficulty understanding these radical movements who had never seen before. But now I can say with some tranquility that is a battalion being more admired every day by people, both Ukrainian and foreign.
9) As Ukrainian resident in Spain … how do you think the media „Spanish” are addressing? Do you have little impact compared to the conflict?
- Very little. Of course, depending on what television channels and newspapers. Although all disappointed me, and who report the least often confused concepts, usually positioned in our favor, but often are influenced by Russian propaganda. I think that if you want to learn more about the situation in Ukraine, should seek other sources of information. Although ideally informed of both sides, and draw your own conclusions, trying not to fall into the trap of Russian propaganda in the attempt.
10) From various media accused the Ukrainian nationalists being tools of the European Union, NATO, Zionism, USA … what do you think of it?
- Propaganda and more propaganda. If we were tools of EU, NATO, USA … we would have all these weapons that we requesting for months, all the artillery we asking for months, all that military equipment … but to my knowledge, still fighting with helmets of the year 43, with weapons, clothes, cars, equipment … etc provided by those Ukrainians. If we are being funded by someone, it would be only for our own people. I personally know people who started the revolution of Maidan, I could say more than a thousand cases of nationalists who have never charged a penny for being in Maidan or risk his life for our people and the future of our Nation. In Maidan we were by an Idea, for our nation, for our future, for our dignity. But never about money. As there are still people who say that the Ukrainian soldiers are paid to kill civilians and pro-Russian people. And that’s like … killing civilians for which we have come to risk our lives? Perhaps the loose those lies that people who do not know what is patriotism and what is nationalism. Those people do not know what it is to fight for your people, love and respect the traditions and culture of your country, put all heart and soul into advancing your nation. These people just are not familiar with these ideas, and they are lost cases. They’ll never understand. It is also curious that just those people, who accuses us of committing genocide (another lie of Russian propaganda) for money, are what create such propaganda nothing more and nothing less than the money. A moral person, who knows reason and, most importantly, THINK BY HIMSELF or herself, never would dare to say that we, Ukrainians, assassinate civilians for money. Or that started the revolution for money. And finally, we are not so bad, or they are so good. Perhaps the accusations started by the Orange Revolution, when the United States admitted that wanted to help the Ukrainian people. But this time, it is not the case.
11) What would you say to all those nationalists there in Europe, including Spain, defending Putin and his expansionist policy?
- Nationalists defending Putin and his policies? They can be anyone but not nationalists for sure. He supports a multicultural policy. People who support his ideas can not be described as a nationalists. I would say just that, that adequate nationalists, even in Russia, do not support Putin, sells all his country pieces, each time gets more and more immigrants and fewer and fewer Russians … etc.They simply say that. And that they should go to save the Russians in Donbass and Crimea.
https://www.facebook.com/azovsna